![]() The first three chapters are focussed on the victims. 1's key arguments).ĪBSTRACT This thesis evaluates representations of the Holocaust in fiction and other genres and emphasises the relationship between the texts examined and the historical events they represent. By the books’ end the reader will gain an insight into how the seemingly undoable can become increasingly doable. Volume two effectively attempts to capture how step-by-step these Nazi innovators attempted to transform the Führer’s wish of a Jewish-free Europe into a frightening reality. Volume two then illustrates how certain innovators within the Nazi regime used the very same Milgram-like learning techniques that with increasing effectiveness gradually enabled them to also transform most ordinary people into increasingly capable executioners of other men, women, and children. ![]() Based on unpublished archival data from Milgram’s personal collection, volume one of this two-volume set introduces readers to a behind the scenes account showing how during Milgram’s unpublished pilot studies he step-by-step invented his official experimental procedure-how he gradually learnt to transform most ordinary people into willing inflictors of harm. Unabated for more than half a century, his (in)famous results have continued to intrigue scholars. 600 inmates about 300 managed to get away.Horrified by the Holocaust, social psychologist Stanley Milgram wondered if he could recreate the Holocaust in the laboratory setting. Guards opened fire and shot some of the escaping prisoners. Some headed straight for the main gate, others used wire cutters to get through the barbed wire fences – other sections of the fencing came down under the weight of hundreds of people trying to clamber over it. However, one SS man found one of his dead colleagues and raised the alarm, triggering chaos amongst the prisoners. Meanwhile the telephone lines had been cut and one prisoner, Stanisław “Shlomo” Szmajzner, managed to obtain some rifles. The same fate awaited ten other SS men, who were killed in a similar manner one after the other. First deputy commandant Niemann (commandant Reichleitner was on leave at the time) was lured into one of the warehouses under some pretext, where he was killed by Russian prisoners with axes. Yet on 14 October 1943 the carefully choreographed revolt began. So the escape attempt would be risky and it was clear that many would not make it. Eventually they too would be sent to the gas chambers or shot and were replaced by new ones. These prisoners were housed in Camp III and never left. This was also done by the special prisoners, who also had to clean the gas chambers of the victims’ vomit and faeces (also the result of the agony of being gassed) and get them ready for the next batch of victims. Initially these were buried in mass graves, but later exhumed bodies as well as the corpses straight from the gas chambers were burned on large pyres using metal fire grates. A special consignment of prisoners then had the most horrible of tasks: emptying the gas chambers of the corpses. ![]() The gassing took an agonizing 20 minutes or longer for everybody inside to be dead. Each chamber was packed as densely as possible with hundreds of victims, then the door was locked and sealed. An outbuilding housed the large internal combustion engine that produced the carbon monoxide gas that was channelled into the gas chambers. After an expansion there were eight separate gas chambers connected by a corridor. This is where the purpose-built gas chambers were. And immediately behind that began what was referred to as Lager III – Camp III. Just before its end the “Schlauch” branched off to a special barrack, where women’s hair was shaved off (men back then rarely wore their hair long).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |